Is Global Government the Hidden Agenda Behind All of Today's Political Issues?

The political debates we see today often seem like separate battles over trade, education, military spending, or debt. Yet I believe these issues share a deeper, underlying question: Should power rest with national governments or shift toward a global government? This tension has shaped much of the 20th and 21st centuries, especially after World War I, and continues to influence policies and public discourse today.

The Origins of the Global Government Idea

The idea of a global government gained traction after World War I, when the Counsel on Foreign Relations (CFR) studied the causes and consequences of the war. The CFR earned credibility when it predicted World War II about 20 years before it happened. This foresight gave weight to their vision of preventing future conflicts through international cooperation.

After World War II, this vision evolved into efforts to create institutions that could govern beyond national borders. The United Nations (UN) became the centerpiece of this effort, supported by a coalition of wealthy individuals and multinational interests. Their goal was to build a world government that could manage global issues like security, trade, health, and finance.

Why a Global Government Means a Weaker United States

For the United States, this push for global governance comes with significant trade-offs. A global government requires the U.S. to cede most of its sovereignty, wealth, and power, which means less control over its military, economy, and even cultural values. Translation: You cannot afford a home, stay out of debt, can no longer just open a business without a government overseeing your daily activities. You lose your free speech, your right to own guns, your privacy, and your right to practice a peaceful religion of your choice!

A global government is not possible without first weakening the United States. Because the United States was so strong, any global government involving the United States would just be a global government of the United States. So for the past 80 years, the plan has been to slowly erode America. If the world today looks more shaky and weaker than it did when we were kids, it is. And this was NOT an accident! It was planned and engineered!

This weakening happens in several ways:

• Military: Reducing national military strength to fit within multinational alliances like NATO limits America’s independent defense capabilities. Getting America's forces to report to NATO instead of the President is and has been the globalist's dream!

• Financial: Global financial institutions such as the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund influence U.S. economic policies, sometimes prioritizing global stability over national interests. They have promoted trade agreements that take from America and fund foreign nations such as China, Japan, Germany, Saudi Arabia, and many others.

• Moral: Global governance often promotes values and policies that conflict with traditional American values of religion and family. The constantly promoted LGBTQ issue is designed to weaken America morally. It has already caused the Methodist church to split.

• Intellectual: The schools are where are children get indoctrinated to the globalist ideals, ideals which are nothing more than communism

  
  

These changes are not accidental. Trade agreements, shifts in school curricula, rising national debt, and cuts to military budgets all fit into a broader plan to align the U.S. with globalist goals.

David Rockefeller, one of the chief architects and funders of most of the globalist initiatives has even been quoted as needing the right crisis to finalize the conversion of America from a great country that stands above, to just a member of more global socialist/communist structure.

How Crises Have Accelerated the Shift

Crises have played a crucial role in transferring power from national governments to global institutions. After major events like wars, financial crashes, or pandemics, governments often pass emergency laws that expand international cooperation and reduce national autonomy.

Examples include:

• The expansion of the World Health Organization’s role during global health emergencies such as Covid.

• Increased influence of the Bank of International Settlements in regulating international banking after financial crises such as the financial crisis of 2008.

• The use of NATO to justify military interventions beyond traditional U.S. borders.

  
  

These shifts often happen quietly, with little public debate, making it harder for citizens to push back against the loss of national control. After all, it's always an emergency!

The Resistance to Globalism

The biggest threat to the globalist agenda is a strong, vocal advocate for national sovereignty. In recent years, figures who promote the idea of "making America great again" have gained popularity because they challenge the narrative that global governance is inevitable or desirable.

This resistance highlights a fundamental conflict: globalists want a world government that dilutes national power, while many Americans want to preserve their country’s independence and strength. This battle plays out in elections, policy debates, and cultural discussions.

We saw just such a discussion this week in Davos Switzerland at the meeting of the World Economic Forum, a powerful international group of globalist-leaning billionaires and business leaders looking to weaken America and strengthen their own interests. Many of those leading the World Economic Forum are nothing but communists pretending to act in your best interest.

This YouTube clip of U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick speaking at the World Economic Forum says it all! 'Globalization has failed' the United States, US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick argues

What This Means for Investors and Professionals

Understanding this dynamic is crucial for anyone involved in investing or professional decision-making. Policies influenced by global governance can affect markets, regulations, and economic stability. For example:

• Trade agreements shaped by global institutions may open or restrict markets unpredictably.

• Changes in military spending can impact defense contractors and related industries.

• Shifts in education and cultural policies influence workforce skills and consumer behavior.

  
  

Being aware of the global versus national government debate helps investors anticipate policy changes and adjust strategies accordingly.

Moving Forward with Awareness

The question of global government versus national government is not just theoretical. It affects real policies and the future of nations. While global cooperation is necessary for some challenges, it is important to critically evaluate how much power is transferred away from national governments like the United States and what that means for democracy, security, and economic freedom.

I encourage readers to stay informed, question the motives behind political shifts, and consider how these changes align with their values and interests. By doing so, we can better navigate the complex political landscape and protect the principles that matter most.

And to just consider that ALL of these issues are NOT about the issue for those promoting it, and instead about driving a globalist agenda to weaken America, drive poverty and dependence into your financial world, and strip you of your constitutional freedoms, is shocking! The next time you hear about the following issues, you will want to ask yourself, what is the real motive?....

• Border Control

• Climate Change

• LGBTQ

• Racism

• Education

• Financial crisis

• Inflation

• Covid

• Ukraine and similar wars

• Social rights

• Environmental issues

• And more recent: A massive divide between Republicans and Democrats which splits America like never before.

Most of these are manufactured issues! Manufactured by the globalists and the media companies they own. Their motivation is get you to elect politicians who will hand even more power to global institutions. Their worst enemy is a billionaire effectively attacking these things and talking about "Making America Great Again!". A billionaire who believes the U.S. Constitution is in fact the Supreme Law of the Land, just as the founding fathers intended!

Finally, I strongly encourage you to listen to this YouTube clip of Walter Cronkite and Hillary Clinton speaking at the World Federalist Association in 1999. Who knew that not only was Hillary Clinton selling out America, but famed news anchor Walter Cronkite was doing the same as well! This shows just how pervasive this line of anti-American, anti-Freedom, and anti-Wealth thinking has become! THIS is why you cannot afford things like we could in the past! ASI presents: Hillary, Walter Cronkite and World Government - YouTube